The Myth of Mob Rule: Violent Crime and Democratic Politics by Lisa L. MillerThe Myth of Mob Rule: Violent Crime and Democratic Politics by Lisa L. Miller

The Myth of Mob Rule: Violent Crime and Democratic Politics

byLisa L. Miller

Hardcover | April 5, 2016

Pricing and Purchase Info

$44.76

Earn 224 plum® points
Quantity:

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

Scholars and lay persons alike routinely express concern about the capacity of democratic publics to respond rationally to emotionally charged issues such as crime, particularly when race and class biases are invoked. This is especially true in the United States, which has the highestimprisonment rate in the developed world, the result, many argue, of too many opportunities for elected officials to be highly responsive to public opinion. Limiting the power of democratic publics, in this view, is an essential component of modern governance precisely because of the risk that broaddemocratic participation can encourage impulsive, irrational and even murderous demands.These claims about panic-prone mass publics -- about the dangers of 'mob rule' -- are widespread and are the central focus of Lisa L. Miller's The Myth of Mob Rule. Are democratic majorities easily drawn to crime as a political issue, even when risk of violence is low? Do they support 'rationalalternatives' to wholly repressive practices, or are they essentially the bellua multorum capitum, the "many-headed beast," winnowing problems of crime and violence down to inexorably harsh retributive justice? Drawing on a comparative case study of three countries -- the U.S., the U.K. and the Netherlands --The Myth of Mob Rule explores when and with what consequences crime becomes a politically salient issue. Using extensive data from multiple sources, the analyses reverses many of the accepted causalclaims in the literature and finds that: serious violence is an important underlying condition for sustained public and political attention to crime; the United States has high levels of both crime and punishment in part because it has failed, in racially stratified ways, to produce fundamentalcollective goods that insulate modern democratic citizens from risk of violence, a consequence of a democratic deficit, not a democratic surplus; and finally, countries with multi-party parliamentary systems are more responsive to mass publics than the U.S. on crime and that such responsivenesspromotes protection from a range of social risks, including from excessive violence and state repression.
Lisa L. Miller is an Associate Professor of Political Science, Rutgers University, and author of The Perils of Federalism (OUP).
Loading
Title:The Myth of Mob Rule: Violent Crime and Democratic PoliticsFormat:HardcoverDimensions:256 pages, 8.5 × 5.51 × 0.03 inPublished:April 5, 2016Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0190228709

ISBN - 13:9780190228705

Look for similar items by category:

Reviews

Table of Contents

Table of Contents1. Mass Publics, Crime, and Democratic Politics2. Security from Violence as Collective Good3. The Non-Politics of Crime in Post-war Britain4. Violence, Racialized Risk, and U.S. Exceptionalism5. Collective Security in The Netherlands6. Two Cheers for Mob RuleMethodological Appendix AMethodological Appendix BReferences