The Place of Emotion in Argument by Douglas WaltonThe Place of Emotion in Argument by Douglas Walton

The Place of Emotion in Argument

byDouglas Walton

Paperback | June 10, 2002

Pricing and Purchase Info

$36.93 online 
$37.95 list price
Earn 185 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Appeals to emotion—pity, fear, popular sentiment, and ad hominem attacks—are commonly used in argumentation. Instead of dismissing these appeals as fallacious wherever they occur, as many do, Walton urges that each use be judged on its merits. He distinguished three main categories of evaluation.

First, is it reasonable, even if not conclusive, as an argument?

Second, is it weak and therefore open to critical questioning for argument? And third, is it fallacious?

The third category is a strong charge that incurs a critical burden to back it up by citing evidence from the given text and context of dialogue.

Walton uses fifty-six case studies to demonstrate that the problem of emotional fallacies is much subtler than has been previously believed. Ranging over commercial advertisements, political debates, union-management negotiations, and ethical disputes, the case studies reveal that these four types of appeals, while based on presumptive reasoning that are tentative and subject to default, are not always or necessarily fallacious types of argumentation.

Title:The Place of Emotion in ArgumentFormat:PaperbackDimensions:312 pages, 8.97 × 6 × 0.74 inPublished:June 10, 2002Publisher:Penn State University Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0271008539

ISBN - 13:9780271008530


Editorial Reviews

“Walton offers some very perceptive criticisms and points on the subject of emotional appeals. His critique of the standard textbook treatment of the subject is a valuable counter to the excesses of the conventional wisdom that this treatment perpetuates, and his observations on the necessity of considering context when assessing the cogency of arguments based on emotional appeals throw important light on the subtleties of such assessments. In these and other ways his book corrects and enlarges our understanding of informal fallacies.”—John Deigh, Informal Logic