The Politics of Accountability in Southeast Asia: The Dominance of Moral Ideologies

Hardcover | March 13, 2014

byGarry Rodan, Caroline Hughes

not yet rated|write a review
Calls by political leaders, social activists, and international policy and aid actors for accountability reforms to improve governance have never been more widespread. For some analysts, the unprecedented scale of these pressures reflects the functional imperatives and power of liberal anddemocratic institutions accompanying greater global economic integration. This book offers a different perspective, investigating the crucial role of contrasting ideologies informing accountability movements and mediating reform directions in Southeast Asia. It argues that the most influentialideologies are not those promoting the political authority of democratic sovereign people or of liberalism's freely contracting individuals. Instead, in both post-authoritarian and authoritarian regimes, it is ideologies advancing the political authority of moral guardians interpreting or ordainingcorrect modes of behaviour for public officials. Elites exploit such ideologies to deflect and contain pressures for democratic and liberal reforms to governance institutions.The book's case studies include human rights, political decentralization, anticorruption, and social accountability reform movements in Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. These studies highlight how effective propagation of moral ideologies is boostedby the presence of powerful organizations, notably religious bodies, political parties, and broadcast media. Meanwhile, civil society organizations of comparable clout advancing liberalism or democracy are lacking. The theoretical framework of the book has wide applicability. In other regions, withcontrasting histories and political economies, the nature and extent of organizations and social actors shaping accountability politics will differ, but the importance of these factors to which ideologies prevail to shape reform directions will not.Oxford Studies in Democratization is a series for scholars and students of comparative politics and related disciplines. Volumes concentrate on the comparative study of the democratization process that accompanied the decline and termination of the cold war. The geographical focus of the series isprimarily Latin America, the Caribbean, Southern and Eastern Europe, and relevant experiences in Africa and Asia. The series editor is Laurence Whitehead, Official Fellow, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$111.50

Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

Calls by political leaders, social activists, and international policy and aid actors for accountability reforms to improve governance have never been more widespread. For some analysts, the unprecedented scale of these pressures reflects the functional imperatives and power of liberal anddemocratic institutions accompanying greater gl...

Garry Rodan is Professor of Politics and International Studies at the Asia Research Centre, School of Management and Governance, Murdoch University, Australia. He is also a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia. He is the author of Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia (RoutledgeCurzon 2004) and The Pol...

other books by Garry Rodan

Format:HardcoverDimensions:248 pagesPublished:March 13, 2014Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0198703538

ISBN - 13:9780198703532

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of The Politics of Accountability in Southeast Asia: The Dominance of Moral Ideologies

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

1. Contrasting ideological rationales for accountability2. Accountability coalitions in the Southeast Asian context3. Political crisis and human rights accountability in Singapore and Malaysia4. Decentralization and accountability in post-socialist Cambodia and Vietnam5. Social accountability in the Philippines and Cambodia6. State-based anticorruption agencies in Indonesia, the Philippines, and ThailandConclusion