The Republic and The Laws by Cicero

The Republic and The Laws

EditorCiceroTranslated byNiall Rudd

Paperback | September 15, 2008

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info

$12.95

Earn 65 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

`However one defines Man, the same definition applies to us all. This is sufficient proof that there is no essential difference within mankind.' (Laws l.29-30) Cicero's The Republic is an impassioned plea for responsible governement written just before the civil war that ended the Roman Republic in a dialogue following Plato. Drawing on Greek political theory, the work embodies the mature reflections of a Roman ex-consul on the nature of politicalorganization, on justice in society, and on the qualities needed in a statesman. Its sequel, The Laws, expounds the influential doctrine of Natural Law, which applies to all mankind, and sets out an ideal code for a reformed Roman Republic, already half in the realm of utopia. This is the first complete English translation of both works for over sixty years and features a lucid Introduction, a Table of Dates, notes on the Roman constitution, and an Index of Names.

About The Author

Niall Rudd is Emeritus Professor of Latin at Bristol University. He has previously translated Juvenal's Satires for Oxford World's Classics. Jonathan Powell is Professor of Latin at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne. He is preparing a new text of De Republica and De Legibus for the Oxford Classical Texts series.

Details & Specs

Title:The Republic and The LawsFormat:PaperbackDimensions:288 pages, 7.72 × 5.08 × 0.51 inPublished:September 15, 2008Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:019954011X

ISBN - 13:9780199540112

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of The Republic and The Laws

Reviews

Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

`In his translation G. achieves a consistent vitality both in narrative... and in argument.'Michael Coffey, The Classical Review Vol.XLIX No.2