The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgements by James O. YoungThe Semantics of Aesthetic Judgements by James O. Young

The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgements

EditorJames O. Young

Hardcover | March 4, 2017

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 473 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


The question of whether aesthetic judgements are simply statements about subjective preferences or whether they have some non-subjective basis is one of the most important questions of aesthetics, and, indeed, of philosophy. In recent years, philosophers of language have discussed aestheticjudgements, but have assumed that aesthetic judgements are similar to judgements that employ predicates of personal taste such as "tasty" and "delicious." A speaker's judgement that an item of food is tasty is a report about the speaker's subjective response to that item of food. If aestheticjudgements are like judgements that employ predicates of personal taste, to judge that the St. Matthew Passion is glorious is also a report about what some listener likes. If two people disagree about whether the St. Matthew Passion is glorious, neither has made a mistake. Philosophers of art havetended to disagree with this view. They have distinguished aesthetic predicates such as "serene," "balanced," and "glorious" from predicates such as "tasty." On this view, the judgement that some artwork is serene or even that it is beautiful is a report about the work, not a report about how aperson responds to the work. Aesthetic judgements are not just statements about personal preferences. This volume brings together some of the leading contemporary philosophers of art and philosophers of language to debate the status of aesthetic judgements. Are they simply expressions of personal preference? Is there more basis for saying that a painting is beautiful or serene than there is forsaying that a cake is tasty? Is disagreement about aesthetic judgements faultless or can someone be mistaken about the aesthetic value of an artwork?
James O. Young, FRSC, is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Victoria. He works on both philosophy of language and philosophy of art and is the author of Global Anti-realism (1995), Art and Knowledge (2001), Cultural Appropriation and the Arts (2008), Critique of Pure Music (2014) and over 50 articles in refereed journals. His...
Title:The Semantics of Aesthetic JudgementsFormat:HardcoverDimensions:240 pagesPublished:March 4, 2017Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0198714599

ISBN - 13:9780198714590

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

James O. Young: Introduction1. Louise McNally and Isidora Stojanovic: Aesthetic Adjectives2. Dan Lopez de Sa: Making Beautiful Truths3. Dominic McIver Lopes: Disputing Taste4. Tim Sundell: Aesthetic Negotiation5. David Davies: The Semantics of Sibleyan Aesthetic Judgements6. Berit Brogaard: A Framework for Aesthetic Expressions7. Elisabeth Schellekens: Value Judgements and Standards of Normative Assessment8. Michael J. Raven: Against the Semantic Orientation towards Aesthetic Judgements9. Carl Matheson: We Really Shouldn't Be Having this Conversation: Rational Disengagement in Science and in Art