Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics: A Misconceived Conflict by Nick FotionTheory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics: A Misconceived Conflict by Nick Fotion

Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics: A Misconceived Conflict

byNick Fotion

Hardcover | July 1, 2014

Pricing and Purchase Info

$72.45 online 
$80.50 list price save 10%
Earn 362 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


This book presents a broad and new theory of theory formation in ethics. There are many existing theories, and more could be generated, but most thinkers of theory formation have a narrow view of what a theory of ethics should be like. They favor certain kinds of grand theories that generatevarious ethical rules and principles. In fact these grand theories allegedly do so much work that they give the appearance of being super-theories (or strong theories). Many theory creators think that it is possible to create strong theories, and that they themselves have created such a theory.Anti-theorists scoff at these claims. In effect, then, the argument between the two sides is not one of theory versus anti-theory but of grand or strong theory versus anti-grand or strong theory.Nick Fotion argues that once a broader view of theory is accepted, it is easier to see that there really is no serious conflict between theorists and anti-theorists. In principle, both sides, if they overcome their addiction to thinking in terms of grand, strong theory formation, can accept a rolefor theories in ethics. Theories in ethics can be either grand or local in nature. Provided theory creators and users don't expect theories to performs all kinds of impossible tasks (e.g., to deal with all of our ethical problems and be so fully justified that only one theory can be accepted asbeing correct) it is easier to accept them. It is also easier to accept the idea that a theorist might very well appeal to more than one theory to help him or her deal with whatever ethical issues bother.
Nick Fotion is Professor of Philosophy at Emory University.
Title:Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics: A Misconceived ConflictFormat:HardcoverDimensions:336 pages, 8.25 × 5.5 × 0.98 inPublished:July 1, 2014Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199373523

ISBN - 13:9780199373529

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

Introduction1. Getting Along (Quite Well) Without You2. Some Conceptual Distinctions3. Theories About Theory4. Beginnings Theory5. Just War Theory6. Exceptions Theory7. Other Local Theories8. John Rawls and T.M. Scanlon9. R. M. Hare10. Michael Slote, Rosalind Hursthouse and Timothy Jackson11. Principles, Rules and Virtue Claims12. Criteria and Privileging13. Completeness, Generation and Universalizability14. Procedures, Justification and Organization15. Weak Theory16. Working With Weak TheoryIndex