Traumatic Politics: The Deputies and the King in the Early French Revolution

Paperback | June 7, 2010

byBarry M. Shapiro

not yet rated|write a review

The opening events of the French Revolution have stood as some of the most familiar in modern European history. Traumatic Politics emerges as a fresh voice from the existing historiography of this widely studied course of events. In applying a psychological lens to the classic problem of why the French Revolution’s first representative assembly was unable to reach a workable accommodation with Louis XVI, Barry Shapiro contends that some of the key political decisions made by the Constituent Assembly were, in large measure, the product of traumatic reactions to the threats to the lives of its members in the summer of 1789. As a result, Assembly policy frequently reflected a preoccupation with what had happened in the past rather than active engagement with present political realities.

In arguing that the manner in which the Assembly dealt with the king bears the imprint of the behavior that typically follows exposure to traumatic events, Shapiro focuses on oscillating periods of traumatic repetition and traumatic denial. Highlighting the historical impact of what could be viewed as a relatively “mild” trauma, he suggests that trauma theory has a much wider field of potential applicability than that previously established by historians, who have generally confined themselves to studying the impact of massively traumatic events such as war and genocide. Moreover, in emphasizing the extent to which monarchical loyalties remained intact on the eve of the Revolution, this book also challenges the widely accepted contention that prerevolutionary cultural and discursive innovations had “desacralized” the king well before 1789.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$46.04

In stock online
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

The opening events of the French Revolution have stood as some of the most familiar in modern European history. Traumatic Politics emerges as a fresh voice from the existing historiography of this widely studied course of events. In applying a psychological lens to the classic problem of why the French Revolution’s first representative...

Barry M. Shapiro is Professor of History at Allegheny College.

other books by Barry M. Shapiro

LARB Digital Edition: The Law Issue
LARB Digital Edition: The Law Issue

Kobo ebook|Nov 1 2013

$3.09 online$3.99list price(save 22%)
Revolutionary Justice In Paris, 1789-1790: Revolutionary Justice In Paris
Revolutionary Justice In Paris, 1789-1790: Revolutionar...

Paperback

$41.40 online$57.95list price(save 28%)
Format:PaperbackDimensions:216 pages, 9 × 6 × 0.58 inPublished:June 7, 2010Publisher:Penn State University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0271035579

ISBN - 13:9780271035574

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Traumatic Politics: The Deputies and the King in the Early French Revolution

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction

Prologue to Part I

1. Arrival in Versailles

2 .The King and His Evil Advisers

3. Defiance at the Jeu de Paume

4. The Royal Session of 23 June

5. The Réunion of 27 June

6. The July Crisis

7. The Immediate Aftermath of the July Crisis

Prologue to Part II

8. An Incident at the Abbaye

9. The Passage of the Suspensive Veto

10. Mirabeau and the Exclusion of Deputies from the Ministry

11. Royal Military Power and the Lingering Effects of Trauma

Conclusion

Selected Bibliography

Index

Editorial Reviews

“Traumatic Politics is an important book that expands current understanding of the Constituent Assembly. Shapiro is undoubtedly correct in recognising and attempting to explain the deputies’ ambivalent and constantly shifting attitudes toward Louis XVI. His sophisticated and careful analysis of the representatives’ letters and diaries and the assembly proceedings provides considerable insight into the deputies’ attitudes toward the king. His interpretation of the important political debates regarding monarchical authority is illuminating. . . . He has demonstrated the extent of the deputies’ fear of royal retribution in the early summer of 1789. He makes a convincing case that one cannot discount the memory of this experience in explaining the deputies’ conduct in the Constituent Assembly.”—Kenneth Margerison, French History