Understanding Inconsistent Science

Hardcover | September 22, 2013

byPeter Vickers

not yet rated|write a review
In recent years philosophers of science have urged that many scientific theories are extremely useful and successful despite being internally inconsistent. Via an investigation of eight alleged "inconsistent theories" in the history of science, Peter Vickers urges that this view is at bestoverly simplistic. Most of these cases can only be described as examples of "inconsistent science" if we employ reconstructions of science which depart from the real (history of) science to an unacceptable degree. And where we do find genuine inconsistency he argues that the nature of - and correctresponse to - the inconsistency differs dramatically depending on the details of the science in question. Thus we are warned against making overly general claims about "science": what are all called "theories" in the history of science are actually significantly different entities, which work indifferent ways and react to inconsistency in different ways. Vickers argues that the traditional goal of philosophy to make substantial, fully general claims about "how science works" is misguided, and can be significantly circumvented if we re-frame our debates such that reference to "theories" is eliminated. In this way one is not tempted to think of thehistory of science as a history of instances of the same kind - theory - about which one could hope to say something substantial and general. And in addition eliminating theory means that we avoid fruitless debates about the "real" nature and content of "theories". Vickers' account leads to aparticularist philosophy of science, where the reader is urged to appreciate the often dramatic differences between the different "inconsistencies in science" which have been identified.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$85.72 online
$94.50 list price (save 9%)
Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

In recent years philosophers of science have urged that many scientific theories are extremely useful and successful despite being internally inconsistent. Via an investigation of eight alleged "inconsistent theories" in the history of science, Peter Vickers urges that this view is at bestoverly simplistic. Most of these cases can only...

Peter Vickers completed his undergraduate BSc in Mathematics and Philosophy at the University of York in 2003. This was followed by an MA in History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Leeds, completed in 2005, and a PhD in the history and philosophy of science, also at the University of Leeds in 2009. Following a year teac...

other books by Peter Vickers

Format:HardcoverDimensions:288 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0.98 inPublished:September 22, 2013Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199692025

ISBN - 13:9780199692026

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Understanding Inconsistent Science

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

1. Introduction2. Concepts and Method3. Bohr's Theory of the Atom4. Classical Electrodynamics5. Newtonian Cosmology6. The Early Calculus7. Further Examples8. ConclusionBibliography