Who Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership by Virgiliu PopWho Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership by Virgiliu Pop

Who Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership

byVirgiliu Pop

Paperback | October 28, 2010

Pricing and Purchase Info

$238.08 online 
$271.95 list price save 12%
Earn 1190 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

This work investigates the permissibility and viability of property rights on the celestial bodies, particularly the extraterrestrial aspects of land and mineral resources ownership. In lay terms, it aims to find an answer to the question "Who owns the Moon?"The first chapter critically analyses and dismantles with legal arguments the issue of sale of extraterrestrial real estate, after having perused some of the trivial claims of celestial bodies ownership. The only consequence these claims have on the plane of space law is to highlight the need for a better regulation of extraterrestrial landed property rights.Next, the work addresses the apparent silence of the law in the field of extraterrestrial landed property, scrutinizing whether the factual situation on the extraterrestrial realms calls for legal regulations.The sources of law are examined in their dual dimension - that is, the facts that have caused and shaped the law of extraterrestrial real estate, and the norms which express this law. It is found that the norms and rules regarding property rights in the celestial realms are rather limited, failing to define basic concepts such as celestial body.The following chapter examines precisely this issue, pondering whether asteroids and comets are immovable land-like territorial extensions that cannot be legally appropriated, or floating movable goods, capable of being captured and reduced into private ownership. The employment of the spatialist and functionalist approaches, the use of the criterion of actual movability from orbit by human action, and original theories such as the analogy between the legal status of asteroids and icebergs, are considered, concluding that some extraterrestrial resources are not, legally speaking, celestial bodies.An examination follows of the relationship between appropriation under international law, and civil law appropriation, namely whether the non-appropriation principle in the Outer Space Treaty on the international plane, results also in the prohibition of the appropriation of the celestial bodies on the private property rights plane. It is offered that, while appropriation of land can exist outside the sphere of sovereignty, its survival is dependent upon backing from a sovereign entity, yet such endorsement would be unlawful as a means of national appropriation.The next chapter answers to the main question of this thesis, offering that de lege lata the extraterrestrial realms, as a commons, belong to "everybody and nobody". The contents of Res communis is duly scrutinized. Res publica is then presented together with the "Public Trust Doctrine". The commons regime currently accepted by most space actors is being challenged on two fronts. On the left, the adepts of the Common Heritage of Mankind paradigm have enacted the Moon Agreement, effectively planting the Marxist standard in the lunar soil. The egalitarian regime of extraterrestrial resource development would sanction the culture of entitlement, favouring a "fair outcome"over "fair process". Such an approach has failed on earth and is poised to fail in outer space, as argued in the following chapter.On the right, the adepts of the "frontier paradigm" seek to promote individualism, competition, economic liberty, efficiency and laissez-faire economics - all linked to a privatization of the international public domain. The frontier paradigm has proven its worth on our planet, and it most likely will do so in the extraterrestrial realms. Property rights are a useful engine and, in al likelihood, a precondition for pushing forward the development of the extraterrestrial realms. Securing property rights would be more beneficial to humankind, compared to the alternative of keeping the extraterrestrial realms undeveloped.The last chapter addresses the lex lata status of materials extracted from the Moon, these pertaining to the legal category of movable goods. Several viewpoints are presented, the conclusion being the permissibility, under the current regulations, of extracting and appropriating extraterrestrial material - be it as a scientific sample or as a commercial commodity.
Virgiliu Pop is a researcher at the Romanian Space Agency and is one of world's specialists in the area of space property rights. A member of the International Institute of Space Law, Virgiliu has authored several acclaimed papers in the field of space law and policy, and was interviewed by prestigious media outlets as diverse as New S...
Title:Who Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources OwnershipFormat:PaperbackDimensions:188 pagesPublished:October 28, 2010Publisher:Springer NetherlandsLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:9048180759

ISBN - 13:9789048180752

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Who Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership

Reviews

Table of Contents

Abstract -Table of Contents - Justification.1 Is The Moon For Sale? 1.1. Introduction 1.2. The Trivial Issue: "Extraterrestrial Real Estate" 1.3. Arguments for Invalidating the "Extraterrestrial Real Estate" Claims 1.4 Conclusion2. The Sources of Landed Property Rights in Outer Space 2.1.Introduction 2.2. Real Property Rights Implications of Space Activities 2.3 The Material Sources Of Landed Property Law In Outer Space 2.4. The Formal Sources of Landed Property Law in Outer Space 2.5 Conclusion3. The Object of Landed Property Rights in Outer Space 3.1 Introduction 3.2. The Concept of "Res" in International Space Law 3.3.Territorial Resources vs. Material Resources, Immovables vs. Movables 3.4. The Different Approaches in Defining Celestial Bodies 3.5. Conclusion4. The Relationship Between Property And Sovereignty In Outer Space 4.1. Introduction 4.2. What Is Property? 4.3. The Impact of the Non-Appropriation Principle Over Property Rights 4.4. Conclusion5. The Commons Regime: Everybody's and Nobody's 5.1. Introduction 5.2. The Extraterrestrial Realms As A Commons 5.3. The Celestial Bodies As Res Communis 5.4. Res Publica and the Public Trust Doctrine 5.5. Arguments For The Commons Paradigm 5.6. Arguments Against The Commons Paradigm 5.7. Conclusion6. Homesteading the Final Frontier 6.1. Introduction 6.2. The High Frontier Thesis 6.3. Arguments For The Frontier Paradigm 6.4. Arguments Against The Frontier Paradigm 6.5 Conclusion7. The Common Heritage of Mankind: Reaping Without Sowing 7.1. Introduction 7.2. The Genesis of the CHM Concept 7.3. The Contents of the Common Heritage of Mankind 7.4. Arguments For the Common Heritage of Mankind 7.5. Arguments Against the Common Heritage of Mankind 7.6. Conclusion8. Property Status of Extraterrestrial Samples and Extracted Resources 8.1. Introduction 8.2. Appropriation of Extraterrestrial Material Under the Outer Space Treaty 8.3. Appropriation of Extraterrestrial Material Under the Moon Agreement 8.4. The Property Regime of Meteorites 8.5. Conclusion9. Instead of Conclusion10. Bibliography - Table of Cases

Editorial Reviews

From the reviews:"Virgiliu Pop, in his contribution to Volume 4 of the Space Regulations Library brings to bear centuries old real property legal theories with the modern day space race. . Pop's work delves deep into the chasm of one of the most underdeveloped areas of property law . . Ultimately, Who Owns the Moon! deserves a close inspection by anyone interested in the fascinating interplay between the law and what was once science fiction but may soon be reality." (Chris Kalantzis, Journal of Space Law, Vol. 37 (2), 2011)