Why Be Good?: A Historical Introduction to Ethics

Paperback | December 5, 2007

byDuncan Richter

not yet rated|write a review
In Plato's Republic, the character Thrasymachus asks whether it is important to be morally good. He contends that the only rational policy to follow is one of strict self-interest; if you can get away with it, why not do the "wrong" thing? Why be good? Ideal for courses in introductory ethics or the history of ethics, Why Be Good?: A Historical Introduction to Ethics takes up Thrasymachus' immoralist challenge, using it as a unifying theme throughout. An engaging and historically organized introduction, this unique volume explores the vitalquestion of why we should be good. Author Duncan Richter presents a series of intriguing responses from the Western philosophical tradition, offering chapters on Plato, Aristotle, prominent thinkers in Christianity, Aquinas, Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Mill, Nietzsche, and several twentieth-centuryphilosophers. In each chapter, Richter focuses on the main ethical theories of the philosopher(s) discussed, explaining their ideas on ethics, virtue, and character and the objections resulting from their arguments. Each chapter builds on the concepts covered in previous chapters; this historicalapproach results in a debate that elucidates the various theories and helps students understand each new argument as a reaction to those that preceded it. The final chapter integrates up-to-date coverage of feminist ethics; evolutionary psychology; contemporary continental philosophers (Derrida inparticular); and analytic virtue ethics since Wittgenstein, with an emphasis on Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, and Rosalind Hursthouse. In contrast with other books on the topic, this text treats all theories equally, including religious views. Focusing on character and virtue ethics, Why Be Good? encourages students to reflect on their own lives, on what it means to be good, and on why--and whether-they should be good. The text is enhanced by key terms (boldfaced the first time they appear), Questions for Further Thought at the endof each chapter, and Suggestions for Further Reading throughout.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$57.16 online
$62.95 list price (save 9%)
Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

In Plato's Republic, the character Thrasymachus asks whether it is important to be morally good. He contends that the only rational policy to follow is one of strict self-interest; if you can get away with it, why not do the "wrong" thing? Why be good? Ideal for courses in introductory ethics or the history of ethics, Why Be Good?...

Duncan Richter is a Professor of Philosophy in the Department of Psychology and Philosophy at Virginia Military Institute.

other books by Duncan Richter

Historical Dictionary of Wittgenstein's Philosophy
Historical Dictionary of Wittgenstein's Philosophy

Kobo ebook|Apr 4 2014

$111.69 online$144.99list price(save 22%)
Anscombe's Moral Philosophy
Anscombe's Moral Philosophy

Kobo ebook|Nov 19 2010

$38.49 online$49.99list price(save 23%)
The A to Z of Wittgenstein's Philosophy
The A to Z of Wittgenstein's Philosophy

Kobo ebook|Feb 12 2010

$38.49 online$49.99list price(save 23%)
see all books by Duncan Richter
Format:PaperbackDimensions:272 pages, 6.42 × 9.09 × 0.51 inPublished:December 5, 2007Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0195325052

ISBN - 13:9780195325058

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Why Be Good?: A Historical Introduction to Ethics

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

IntroductionChapter One: PlatoChapter Two: AristotleChapter Three: ChristianityChapter Four: AquinasChapter Five: HobbesChapter Six: HumeChapter Seven: KantChapter Eight: MillChapter Nine: NietzscheChapter Ten: Virtue after NietzscheConclusion

Editorial Reviews

"Why Be Good provides a valuable introduction to the history of moral thought that is regrettably lacking in the many survey-type texts that focus ineffectively on available ethics theories to the detriment of the rationale behind them."--Joel Whittemore, McMurry University